Position sizing in thin markets
In a thin pair your size decides your exit price. Sizing from pool depth instead of account balance, with the constant-product arithmetic worked through.
Read the entryYou do not control whether a trade works. You control the size you chose, the exit you wrote, and the sentence that ends the position when the reason for it stops being true. That is the entire list, and it is why this section sits underneath everything else on the site.
On Solana the constraint is usually depth rather than conviction. In a thin pair your own order is part of the price, so a position that looks modest against your account can be large against the pool it has to leave through. These notes work that arithmetic out in the open.
The part of a method you actually control. Size chosen from depth rather than conviction, exits decided before entry, and an invalidation written in advance so a bad trade ends on schedule.
In a thin pair your size decides your exit price. Sizing from pool depth instead of account balance, with the constant-product arithmetic worked through.
Read the entryFour exit types, what each one costs, and how a scale-out ladder behaves when depth thins under it. Written before entry or it is not an exit plan.
Read the entryAn invalidation is a sentence written before entry that ends the trade without a new argument. Four kinds, how to write one, and how they fail on chain.
Read the entrySizing and invalidation are decided before a situation is even identified, which is why they read as constraints rather than tactics. The playbooks apply them; the situation notes describe the conditions they are applied in.
The recurring shapes a Solana market takes when liquidity arrives, moves or leaves: a first listing, a migration between venues, an activity spike, and the ordinary hours in between.
A playbook is a situation plus a rule you wrote before the situation appeared. Each one here states its trigger, its cost, the case where it fails and the condition that retires it.